Yet it's also been a major lender to ConocoPhillips, which is set to start drilling soon along the Kokolik River in northern Alaska. On its site, the bank states that it is committed to "supporting our clients and financing opportunities that accelerate the transition to a low-carbon economy." Yet JPMorgan remains by far the biggest financier of fossil fuel projects in the world, is a major investor in ConocoPhillips and has vigorously opposed the SEC's new climate disclosure requirements.Īmong the lending institutions with ambitious climate change goals is Canada's Toronto-Dominion Bank, which has set a target to mobilize $363 billion for environmental, decarbonization and social projects by 2030. For example, JPMorgan Chase is a key member of the Net-Zero Banking Alliance, a consortium of the largest banks in the world that have committed to reduce emissions from their lending and investment portfolios to net zero by 2050. JPMorgan's ratio was 0.7 in 2021 while Wells Fargo's ratio that year was even lower, at 0.4.Īnd when it comes to their stated commitments to tackling climate change, banks have not followed through on their pledges. Yet at the end of 2021, that ratio stood at 0.8 to 1 - meaning that clean energy financing still lags behind fossil fuel financing at those banks. That ratio needs to hit 4 to 1 by 2030 if the planet is to avoid the worst consequences of climate change as laid out in the Paris accords, according to BloombergNEF. The group developed Energy Supply Banking Ratios for each firm - showing the ratio of clean-energy lending and underwriting relative to those for fossil fuels. The activities of the biggest banks in the world - including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo - were highlighted in a recent report by commodities research provider BloombergNEF. So we're standing up: if banks won't cut carbon, we'll cut our credit cards." "Despite every warning from scientists they keep forking over cash to keep Big Oil expanding - for many people, the money they store in the bank produces more carbon than everything else they do in their daily lives. "The banks are at the heart of the climate fight right now," said McKibben in announcing the pledge. Advocates will gather at over 100 events in half the states in the country - cutting up their credit cards in New York City, organizing flash mobs in Sacramento and taking part in a rocking-chair vigil in Washington, D.C., with speeches from such figures as veteran environmentalist author Bill McKibben.Īs part of the campaign, more than 17,000 bank customers have signed the Banking On Our Future pledge to close their accounts and cut up their credit cards if the banks continue to fund fossil fuels - sending them to bank CEOs and delivering them at branches around the country.
The protest will focus on the four largest financiers of fossil fuel projects in the world: JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Bank of America and Wells Fargo.
The disconnect between words and actions has outraged climate activists, who are gathering for a day of action on Tuesday, March 21. Whether through lending or the underwriting of debt and equity issuances, banks are at the heart of this funding - which is dominated by American banks. The financing of fossil fuel production grew from $723 billion in 2016 to $742 billion in 2021, with the world's 60 largest banks financing $4.6 trillion in total in the six years following the 2015 Paris accords. Last week the Biden administration approved ConocoPhillips' plans for drilling in the Arctic - despite the opposition of environmentalists and a pressure campaign that led many banks, including Barclays and Goldman Sachs, to rule out the financing of drilling projects anywhere in the environmentally fragile region.
Yet at the same time, oil and gas projects that require backing from banks keep getting approved even as a new report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change shows that the world is on track to fall short of its most ambitious goal - drastically slowing global warming - and that more aggressive steps must be taken to avert a climate catastrophe.
Earlier this month, Citi and Deutsche Bank both tightened their policies on the financing of fossil fuel production. This article originally appeared on Capital & Main.īanks around the world have been busy laying out plans to reduce financing of the energy sectors most responsible for greenhouse gases.
0 kommentar(er)
